CYBREI Carbon Crankset – Carbon Chainring w/ Xcadey Powermeter Spider
$989.00 – $1,059.00
- Using Toray high modulus carbon fiber, crankset only 320g (29mm, 170mm)/ 335g (24mm, 170mm)
- Super high rigidity, the second generation of dual-channel technology improves crank rigidity by 12%
- Offering 24mm titanium/29mm aluminum spindle, adaptable to more frames
- Cold forged 7075 aluminum alloy axle core brings unimaginable rigidity and durability
- Passed 1800N 14w crank fatigue test and 5600N crank damage test, far exceeding EU standards
Panda Podium Review
This is a great crankset for a weight weenie build. One of the chainring holes on the XCADEY power meter was slightly undersized. XCADEY offered a replacement, but I just filed the hole bigger myself.... keep reading
What Customers Think
- Description
- Additional information
- Brand
- Reviews (3)
Description
DESCRIPTION
| CYBREI ROAD CRANBON CRANKSET | |
| CRANK ARM LENGTH | 155.5mm; 157.5mm; 160mm; 162.5mm; 165mm; 167.5mm; 170mm; 172.5mm; 175mm |
| SPEEDS | 11s；12s |
| MATERIAL | High-mode carbon |
| SPINDLE SIZE | Width 92mm Diameter 28.99mm/24mm |
| BB COMPATIBILITY | All 28.99mm/24mm BBs |
| SPIDER INTERFACE | CYBREI 16T |
| CHAINLINE | 44.5mm |
| Q FACTOR | 148mm |
| WEIGHT | 563.1 g/pair（170mm, spindle|50/34T|Xcadey powermeter spider） |
Additional information
| Crank Length | 150mm (Pre-order only), 155mm, 157.5mm, 160mm, 162.5mm, 165mm, 167.5mm, 170mm, 172.5mm, 175mm |
|---|---|
| Crank Spindle Options | 24mm Spindle, 29mm Spindle |
| Chainring Size | 50-34T, 52-36T, 54-38T |
| Spider Type | Xcadey Power Meter Spider ( 4*110 BCD ) |
Brand
Cybrei
| Brand Name: Cybrei | Chinese Company Name: 厦门市益百克运动器材有限公司 |
| Founded: 2021 | # of Employees: 5-10 |
| Headquarters: Xiamen, Fujian | Products Categories: Wheels, Cranks, Chainrings, Bottom Brackets, etc |
3 reviews for CYBREI Carbon Crankset – Carbon Chainring w/ Xcadey Powermeter Spider
Add a review
You must be logged in to post a review.
Joe Whittingham –
This is a great crankset for a weight weenie build. One of the chainring holes on the XCADEY power meter was slightly undersized. XCADEY offered a replacement, but I just filed the hole bigger myself. The whole setup is super light (especially considering the presence of a power meter.) Shifting has also been perfect. It occasionally sounds a bit crunchy, but it always shifts so that’s all that matters to me. As a weight weenie, I mainly chose this for the weight to cost to performance ratio, and in that department, it gets 5 stars.
neilinoz (verified owner) –
Awesome communication from Tom, answering all of my questions quickly and fully. The product arrived quickly (though I think the DHL express charge is a bit high). the carbon cranks are stunning and so light. I went for the extra price Titanium axle as I prefer 24mm axle for bigger bearings with a PF86. The power meter is easy to set up and use with long battery life and simple charging. The 54 carbon big ring is awesome looking with good shifting. Overall I would give it 5 stars as a package, love it!
Tuan Nguyen (verified owner) –
Great crankset. The Panda team were very communicative, had a delay due to stock for 160m cranks, but got shipped as soon as they got them in. For the price, quality its an excellent crankset!
The only issues I had was just with the chainring bolts, they rated 7-8mm torque, but I reckon they’re going to be a tad bit less, or get better bolts I almost stripped a bunch of the torx head (lost one bolt in the process – luckily there was a spare). I’d also recommend putting anti-seize or at least grease minimum on the threads, and surface under the bolt otherwise you aren’t getting them out later…
The Xcadey power meter was a bit out of whack at the beginning, so I suggest following its guide and calibrating it (maybe before every ride). I did a comparison against my trainer (jet black victory), which has been tested to be pretty accurate by GPlama, and the Xcadey was reading around 10-15 watts under or 15% under. In the Xcadey app you can adjust the scale. Noting that GPlama tested the version one and it was around 5% under the Favero’s Assioma duo. Values seem consistent given its comparing indoor vs dual meters as well. So Overall im pretty happy with the results.